Global hotel occupancy surpasses 2019 levels

With two years of summer holidays lost to Covid-19 restrictions and uncertainty, there is huge pent-up demand for travel as we enter the 2022 summer season.

It is expected to be the busiest since the pandemic began, and hoteliers need to anticipate and be prepared for the demand amid ongoing challenges amplified by the pandemic.

According to Amadeus’ Demand360 business intelligence data, hotel reservations have been on par with pre-pandemic 2019 booking levels since March this year.

April 2022 was the first month to surpass 2019 occupancy levels and continued to climb in May hitting a new high of 63 per cent, compared to 60 per cent in May 2019.

High performing countries like the US saw occupancy levels of 68 per cent for the month, seven per cent above the 2019 performance, while Canada reached 64 per cent occupancy in May, eight per cent higher than the same time in 2019.

Forward looking on-the-books data tells a similar story globally with the summer months of June, July, and August currently tracking just one per cent off 2019 levels.

For true insight however, occupancy has to be considered alongside a persistently short booking window (number of days travellers are booking in advance of their trip).

This data shows that the significant majority of trips (54 per cent) are currently being booked 0-7 days before travel, which means that hotel occupancy rates currently recorded for the summer months could increase significantly.

In the case of the US travel market, 55 per cent of bookings are made less than a week prior to travel.

Europe is generally slightly more predictable with over a third of 0-7-day bookings (France 33 per cent, Germany 35 per cent, Spain 36 per cent, and UK 39 per cent) made within 0-7 days.

With high demand, the transient average daily rate (ADR) hoteliers are able to achieve has been building steadily from a global low of $83 in April 2020.

According to forward looking Amadeus data for June, July, and August 2022, the worldwide average ADR is $200 which is just over 11 per cent higher than in 2019 where the average ADR was $180 for the same months.

Individual countries are seeing high room rates over the summer, with France forecasted to hit an ADR of $428 in July 2022, which is a 29 per cent increase on 2019 rates.

Remaining restrictions are still influencing where travellers are originating from.

Hoteliers, destination management organisations (DMOs), and travel sellers are tracking Amadeus data closely to understand which countries are booking the most flights to their markets, and where additional marketing could help drive demand.

According to Amadeus air booking data as of June 4th, 2022, the US leads all countries in top inbound flights for the forthcoming summer months, followed by the UK, France, Germany, and then Canada.

Amadeus car rental data as of June 3rd, 2022, also shows worldwide demand increasing this year, with 33 per cent more bookings made for the months of June, July, and August compared to the same time in 2021.

Rental lengths are also up in 2022 over 2021 (six days vs five days on average), with a higher average daily rate of $102 vs $92.

Based on 2021 performance for the summer travel season, 54 per cent of bookings were made within a week of travel, which provides significant opportunities for car rental volumes to grow.

Katie Moro, vice president, data partnerships, hospitality, Amadeus comments: “We’re proud to showcase the most comprehensive historical and forward-looking travel data available on the market today, which will be instrumental in helping the travel sector strategise and prepare for a welcome summer surge.

“The data clearly shows the proportion of travellers that are booking in the last seven days before travel, for example, which should give hoteliers the confidence to keep their room rates steady and not be tempted to drop them to attract more business.”

Having access to real-time market insights allows hoteliers and DMOs to target travellers at the right time, at the best rate, to rebuild their businesses.

For more details on summer travel trends, such as hotel occupancy, ADR, booking windows, top inbound flights and car rentals in the US, Canada, UK, France, Germany, and Spain, as well as a worldwide overview, please visit our website.
Francisco Pérez-Lozao Rüter, president, hospitality, Amadeus, added: “It is fantastic to see the revival of travel that is underway.

“We will continue to work closely with our hotel partners to ensure they have the technology and insights they need to deliver excellent guest experiences in the face of continued labour shortages and last-minute bookings.

“This is where technology plays such a crucial role in helping hoteliers manage daily operations as efficiently as possible.”

Source: Breaking Travel News

‘Dubai Destinations’ campaign continues with focus on unique summer experiences

Under the directives of His Highness Sheikh Ahmed bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Chairman of the Dubai Media Council, the #DubaiDestinations initiative is continuing its campaign with a focus on highlighting the city’s exceptional experiences, and exciting events and activities during the summer.

The campaign encourages Dubai’s diverse community to discover the city’s unique destinations in the summer and enjoy its distinctive offerings ranging from beach activities, dining and family-friendly activities at hotels, to waterparks, water sports adventures and indoor entertainment that capture the essence of Dubai’s summer experience.

The initiative aims to create and disseminate to local, regional and global audiences engaging content that highlights Dubai’s unique character and identity as well as its emergence as the world’s best place to live and visit.

The current season of the #DubaiDestinations campaign, running until the end of August, brings together a wide range of public and private sector stakeholders to showcase the emirate’s various exciting experiences. Key partners in the campaign include: the Department of Economy and Tourism in Dubai; Dubai Municipality; the Roads and Transport Authority; the Dubai Culture and Arts Authority; Dubai Sports Council; Dubai Ladies Club; Emaar; Dubai Holding; Nakheel Properties; Majid Al Futtaim Group; and Merex Investment Office.

Mona Al Marri, Vice Chairperson and Managing Director of the Dubai Media Council and Director General of the Government of Dubai Media Office (GDMO), said, “Since its launch, the #DubaiDestinations campaign has focused on highlighting the quintessential Dubai experience and its uniqueness as a destination that offers a range of experiences that meet the tastes and interests of people across ages and nationalities. With the focus now on Dubai’s various summer destinations, the campaign will showcase all that the city has to offer during this season with the objective of further raising the city’s profile as a leading global destination.

“As with each season of the campaign, the initiative aims to inspire citizens, residents and tourists to explore the captivating variety of leisure and entertainment choices in the city, including Dubai’s vibrant dining scene, its picturesque beaches, pools, outdoor activities and indoor attractions,” she added.

Issam Kazim, CEO of Dubai Tourism and Commerce Marketing (DTCM), noted, “The #DubaiDestinations campaign has contributed to enhancing domestic tourism and boosting the city’s appeal among foreign tourists as a must-visit destination. It has also been able to showcase Dubai as a top family destination by highlighting the city’s exceptional activities and experiences. The latest season of the campaign complements DTCM’s efforts to raise the visibility of the emirate’s various summer attractions and promote the city as an attractive summer destination that offers families a diversity of offerings and experiences to choose from.”

Shaima Al Suwaidi, Director of Brand Dubai, the creative arm of the Government of Dubai Media Office, commented, “The #DubaiDestinations campaign is a key initiative that highlights everything that makes the emirate one of the world’s most distinctive destinations, from its mix of cultures, its culinary melting pot, world-class shows, events, festivities, and entertainment activities. During the next few weeks, Brand Dubai will continue to enhance the profile of Dubai’s various destination offerings, with a special focus on promoting summer destinations and telling stories about the Dubai experience through interactive guides, creative videos, social media platforms and other activations.”

Al Suwaidi added that Brand Dubai is set to launch a series of guides designed to help people discover hidden gems in the emirate. These guides will cover exciting summer and weekend activities, summer camps, seaside dining options, and other businesses running fun programmes during the summer. Brand Dubai will also be partnering with several content creators to develop videos and promotional content that will highlight the top activities, experiences and events in the city and where to find them.

The #DubaiDestinations campaign will also promote indoor attractions, such as cinemas, indoor sports activities and theme parks, in addition to showcasing Dubai’s most-loved homegrown food outlets from the ‘Proudly from Dubai’ network, an initiative launched by Brand Dubai to highlight the success stories of businesses born and initiated in Dubai.

As part of the campaign, some of the emirate’s most accomplished creatives including influencers, photographers, digital media content creators, visual artists, animators and videographers will also be invited to create captivating content about Dubai’s destination offerings.

Source: Emirates News Agency

Turkish Airlines to rebrand as Türkiye Hava Yolları

Turkish Airlines (TK, Istanbul New) is set to rebrand as Türkiye Hava Yolları (THY) domestically following the decision by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to rename the country Türkiye.

“We have taken another symbolic step by changing the name of our country, which is used internationally as Turkey, to Türkiye. There is no longer Turkey. There is Türkiye. From now on, we will write Türkiye Hava Yolları, not Turkish Airlines, on the fuselages of our planes,” Erdogan said during a press conference.

He later clarified that the rebranding would only affect the carrier’s domestic operations. Turkish Airlines is already referred to as Türk Hava Yollari domestically, although all aircraft sport the English name. As the carrier does not have any aircraft dedicated exclusively to domestic operations, it is unclear how the rebranding will proceed.

Erdogan revealed no timeline for the rebranding for the airline, which is legally incorporated as Türk Hava Yollari AO.

Turkish Airlines is technically a public company with 50.88% of shares open for trading. The Türkiye Wealth Fund holds a 49.12% stake, while the Turkish Ministry of Finance owns a single golden share whose veto rights give the government effective control over the company.

Source: Ch-aviation

KQ, Delta expand codeshare deal to reach 44 cities

Kenya Airways and Delta Airlines have expanded their partnership, offering their customers seamless travel to a total of 44 cities in Africa, the United States and Canada.

Passengers travelling from Nairobi to the US on Kenya Airways can now access 25 cities in America and Canada using one ticket following the expansion of the codeshare partnership between the two carriers.

The enhanced partnership also allows Delta customers travelling from the US access to 19 cities in Africa. The additional cities include Boston, Buffalo, Norfolk and Rochester.

“Kenya Airways will place its code on Delta flights from New York-JFK to Boston, Buffalo, Norfolk, Rochester and Syracuse for customers flying on its nonstop Nairobi- New York-JFK services,” KQ, as the national carrier is known by its international code, said in a statement.

“Meanwhile, Delta will add its code to Kenya Airways’ additional frequencies between Accra, Ghana, and Freetown, Sierra Leone, Monrovia, Liberia, and Nairobi, Kenya.”

Customers of the two airlines will continue to enjoy one-stop connections from Nairobi, Accra, and New York to destinations already served by Kenya Airways and Delta in Africa and the U.S.

These include Columbus, Dallas, Washington and Boston in the US, and Kilimanjaro, Zanzibar, Mombasa, and Entebbe.

The two airlines formed the partnership in August 2018 –10 weeks before KQ introduced direct flights to New York— and have been expanding it since then.

Codeshare, in which participating airlines agree to carry each other’s customers, helps carriers to expand their reach without incurring additional investment in aircraft and staff.

Airlines have various arrangements for paying each other in such agreements, including ceding a portion of a customer’s fare to the carrier operating the flight.

Some of the benefits for customers include easier travel, including pre-arranged connecting flights.

Delta’s customers, for instance, will be able to connect from the carrier’s daily New York-JFK-Accra flights with one ticket and checked-through baggage.

The enhanced codeshare deal with Delta adds to other partnerships that KQ has signed with other airlines to grow its reach.

Last month, it inked a partnership with Africa World Airlines, a West Africa regional carrier operating out of Ghana, in a move aimed at extending its reach to the continent’s west coast.

The agreement provides passengers with flight connections from KQ’s network to various points through Accra including Kumasi, Takoradi, Lagos, and Abuja.

Source: Business Daily

The Traveller’s Guide To Carbon Offsetting Your Flights

A beginner’s guide to carbon offsetting flights for air travellers, including what carbon offsets are, how they work, how to choose the best offset scheme and ways to reduce your environmental impact.

I have a love-hate relationship with air travel. I love the places flying takes me, but I’m not a fan of the actual plane bit. But as well as worrying about being up in the air, I’ve started worrying more about the environmental impact of flying, and especially the way it contributes to climate change. Carbon offsetting flights is often mentioned as a partial solution to the problem, but what is offsetting and how does it work, if at all?

The Environmental Impact Of Flying

Flights account for around 2.5% of global carbon dioxide production at the moment, but the industry is expanding. And because planes fly high the atmosphere, the greenhouse gases they emit do more damage than on the ground. New technologies like biofuels or electric planes are in the pipeline which could reduce flying’s environmental impact. But they’re a huge investment and need years of safety testing, so it’s a slow process.

Until then airlines are trying to increase efficiency by reducing weight, carrying more passengers, using tailwinds and reducing distances through air traffic control (though cynics might say that’s more about saving money than the environment).

Regulations are starting to put pressure on airlines to reduce their impact, but the rising demand for flights is outstripping any reduction in emissions. There’s a crazy statistic that only 6% of the world’s population has ever flown, so there’s huge potential growth.

I’m trying to cut down on flights and take the train where I can, but there are so many places I’d love to visit where I’ve got no choice but to fly. So is there anything we can do?

Carbon Offsetting Your Flights

One of the ways it’s been suggested air travellers can reduce the impact they have on the environment is through carbon offsetting their flights. Carbon offsets are voluntary schemes where people pay to ‘offset’ or make up for the emissions their flights produce.

It sounds good in practice, but not a lot of people use them. Many passengers don’t know they exist, but even more are confused (or dubious) about which schemes to use.

Offsets aren’t straightforward and they’ve often been controversial – some of the schemes are run by profit-making companies and there’s no standard certification to show which are worthwhile. There are also moral questions about whether paying to pollute makes people less likely to change their behaviour. So what’s the truth about carbon offsetting?

How Does Carbon Offsetting Work?

Aircraft engines produces greenhouses gases, particles and water vapour which are released into the atmosphere. It’s this mixture that makes them so polluting, but the focus of offsetting is on carbon dioxide (CO2) as it’s the most common greenhouse gas.

Carbon offsetting flights doesn’t get rid of the carbon dioxide which is produced when you fly – that still goes into the atmosphere. What it does do is try and make up for your share of the CO2 which gets released by reducing it somewhere else instead, which will slow help to down the overall global increase in carbon dioxide levels.

This is usually based on measuring how many tonnes of CO2 are produced by each flight and investing in a project which reduces CO2 levels by the same amount.

There are two main types of offset project. First forestry projects, which either stop existing trees being cut down or plant new ones. The trees act as a ‘biological sink’ by taking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. And secondly energy projects, which reduce the amount of fossil fuels used by investing in energy-efficient products or renewable technology. Often these projects have social and sustainability benefits for the countries involved too.

Sounds simple but any carbon offset project has to meet three criteria to be effective. There has to be additionality – which means the project wouldn’t have happened if it hadn’t been funded by the money from the carbon offsets. There has to be no leakage – so you can’t reduce emissions in one place if it means they’re increased somewhere else instead.

It also has to be permanent – so it won’t be reversed in the future (which can be a challenge for forestry projects, as how can you guarantee trees will never be cut down?).

How Are Carbon Offsets Calculated?

Various calculators have been developed to work out how much carbon dioxide you produce on a flight. The most basic just look at how many miles you’ve flown. Better offset schemes also take into consideration the class of travel you’re flying in, the type of aircraft and how fuel efficient it is, the number of passengers it holds and the occupancy rate.

But if you wanted to be super-accurate you’d also need to take into account the time of day and weather conditions too, which affect how much fuel is used. Every carbon offset scheme calculates things differently – and some are a lot more comprehensive than others.

How Much Does Carbon Offsetting Cost?

Because the calculators all work differently, the amount you pay varies too. I tested out a couple of the big calculators by looking at the amount of carbon I produced in a year.

Two long-haul return flights from the UK to the Caribbean and four short-haul return flights in Europe came to 7.5 tonnes. A short European flight (London to Geneva) is around €10, a longer one (London to Malta) €20 and the UK to the Caribbean €60.

It was interesting to see that making a stopover increases the amount of carbon you produce. As does flying in business or first class instead of economy – the lower passenger numbers in these classes mean they’re a less efficient use of space.

A flight from London to Dubai would cost €50 to offset if you were in economy versus €95 in business class and €145 in first class. With a lot of people at the front end of the plane travelling for work, I wonder how many companies use offsets?

Which Scheme Should I Use?

If you decide to carbon offset flights, the big issue is choosing which scheme to use. There are a baffling number, most of which make impressive claims and have websites covered in pictures of forests. But they’re not all regulated and how some are funded is a bit fuzzy.

Sussing out the good from the bad is a full-time job, so it’s usually a case of taking advice from environmental organisations who’ve examined them and certified the best.

Carbon Offsetting With Your Airline

The easiest option is to offset directly with the airline when you book your flight. You just pay an extra fee on top of the flight cost which is donated to a carbon offset scheme. Around a third of airlines have some sort of carbon offset programme, but how they work varies.

Some have their own schemes and others are enrolled in other people’s. Some are upfront about their offset programmes and others hide them away. Some give you the option to offset before booking and some only after (so you can’t see the cost until you’ve booked).

Among the airlines doing good things with offsets are Qantas, whose Fly Carbon Neutral scheme claims to be the largest airline offsetter. They offset staff travel and offer frequent flyer points to passengers buying offsets. Other verified schemes include Air Canada’s with Less Emissions, KLM’s CO2ZERO and Austrian Airlines with Climate Austria.

If your airline has a carbon offset scheme, take a look at their website before buy to see if it’s worthwhile, or whether you’re better off spending your money elsewhere.

Things to look at include how offsets are calculated (is it just mileage-based or more comprehensive?), the type of projects they fund, what percentage of the money is used in admin and whether they’re certified by a verified scheme like Gold or Carbon Standard.

Carbon Offsetting Directly

Some airlines like Emirates choose not to offer offsets. Or you might want to offset flights you’ve already taken. And if you want to choose which type of project – or even which specific project – you fund, it’s usually best to offset directly. Gold Standard is one of the most widely recommended bodies and the name I kept coming across.

Gold Standard is a Swiss non-profit organisation which was founded by a group of environmental groups and NGOs including the WWF. Their projects are based in developing countries and combine reducing CO2 with sustainable development.

They don’t have their own calculator but they do have links to a couple where you can work out the amount of carbon you’ve used then choose a project to donate to. Otherwise they have various partners who run Gold Standard certified projects around the world:

  • Atmosfair in Germany (who have a particularly good calculator which rates airline efficiency and includes other greenhouses gases as well as CO2)
  • MyClimate in Switzerland
  • Climate Care in the UK
  • Terrapass in the US.

So Is It Worth Carbon Offsetting Flights?

Does carbon offsetting really make a difference? The same amount of carbon dioxide is going to be released on that flight whether you offset or not. And it’s been argued that offsetting is just a way for people to feel less guilty without having to change their behaviour, and the only way to really reduce emissions is to stop flying entirely.

But at present flying is a part of life – from seeing family abroad to supporting the economy in destinations like the Maldives. And if you do have to (or want to) fly, then I would argue that offsetting has got to be better than doing nothing. My year’s flights came in at €175 to offset – enough to make me think about my flying habits and cut down since.

Environmental group Ethical Consumer advise choosing an individual project to fund rather than letting the company pick, so you know where your money’s going. And that energy efficiency projects are better than forestry as they directly reduce fossil fuel usage. They also recommend wind and solar over biomass as it’s less likely to be misused.

Choosing a specific project does usually mean you pay more but it means you know you’re getting the maximum benefit. Otherwise you can just create your own offset by working out what you would have spent and donating it to an environmental charity.

What Else Can I Do To Reduce My Impact?

Well obviously the best way to reduce your impact is not to fly at all! That’s not going to be practical for most people, but it’s often possible to cut down or change how you fly.

Reduce Short-Haul Flights

Short-haul flights under 500km are comparatively the worst polluters because it takes a lot of energy for the plane to get up and down. So could you take a train or bus instead sometimes? This can massively reduce the amount of carbon you produce – a return trip from London to Paris produces 110kg of CO2 by plane versus 6.6kg by train.

There’s often the idea that flying is a lot quicker but when you add in time getting to and waiting at the airport it often doesn’t make much difference. 80% of flights from the UK to Europe are to destinations which you could reach by train within a day.

Looking at my year’s travels, the trips to the Alps and Munich could have been pretty easily done by train and I’ve cut right down on short-haul flights since. Rail travel through multiple countries in Europe has been made more difficult by pandemic travel restrictions but hopefully this is only temporary and it’ll be possible again soon.

Choose A More Efficient Airline

The airline you fly with makes a big difference to your emissions. Lower impact airlines usually have more modern, fuel-efficient planes and carry more passengers.

Atmosfair have some helpful rankings to help you decide which airline to choose – surprisingly charter airlines like TUI are among the best, as well as Jet2, Air Transat, KLM and Air New Zealand. And worst are US carriers United and Delta’s regional networks.

Choose A More Efficient Flight

The flight you choose can also have an impact. Because take off and landing are when the largest amount of emissions are produced, it’s better to fly direct rather than with a stopover as you only have to do it once. Flying economy instead of business or first-class also reduces your carbon emissions (sadly not a choice I often need to make!).

Apply Some Pressure

I said the same thing when talking about cruises, but pressure from consumers is so important in getting businesses to act in a more environmentally responsible way. The more people who ask about airline emissions – whether it’s an airline’s carbon offset policies or what technology they’re investing in – the more airlines will take things seriously if they think it’s having an impact on who we spend our money with.

Source: On The Luce

Heathrow to reopen Terminal 4 after two years of closure

London Heathrow airport will reopen Terminal 4 on June 14, 2022, two years after it was closed due to decreased passenger traffic caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.  

Qatar Airways will be the first carrier to return to Terminal 4, followed by 30 other airlines.  

“While we are still years away from passenger numbers returning to pre-pandemic levels, reopening Terminal 4 will give airlines at Heathrow extra space across the airport, helping them manage the impact additional travel documents continue to have on check in times,” Heathrow CEO John Holland-Kaye announced in a statement. 

The reopening of Terminal 4 will free up space in Heathrow’s T1, T2 and T5 ahead of summer peak. Additionally, Heathrow is currently recruiting 1,000 new security personnel as part of a plan to maintain smooth passenger service throughout the summer.    

The UK’s busiest airports, including Heathrow, have been facing long queues as well as numerous flight cancellations and delays due to staff shortages for the past few weeks.   

Heathrow now forecasts that a total of 53 million passengers will travel through the airport in 2022, an increase of 16% compared to previous assumptions. The airport said previously that it expected passenger traffic to reach 45.5 million in 2022.    

Source: Aerotime Hub

Global air cargo demand has fallen 11.2%, IATA reports

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has released its April 2022 air cargo market analysis, reporting a decline in global air cargo demand as well as reduced capacity.    

According to the report, global demand measured in cargo tonne-kilometers (CTKs) fell 11.2% in In April 2022 compared to April 2021, and international operations dropped 10.6% during the same period. 

“Global demand is down 1% compared to April 2019,” IATA noted.  

Indicators  

According to IATA, the drop, which created a “challenging operating backdrop”, can be attributed to the effects of Omicron in Asia and the Russia–Ukraine war.  

The association highlights that the war in Ukraine resulted in the decline of cargo capacity of “key cargo players” from Russia and Ukraine-based operators that used to serve European market. 

These challenges were further attenuated by China’s zero-COVID policy and flight cancellations resulting from labor shortages.  

IATA noted that “The lockdowns have brought much of the world’s largest port, Shanghai, to a standstill,” as the global goods trade declined as a result of China’s slowing economic growth. 

“Capacity was 2% below 2021 (+1.2% for international operations),” said IATA. “Both global capacity and international capacity decreased slightly in April [2022] compared to March [2022]. Asia experienced the largest falls in capacity.” 

Willie Walsh, IATA’s Director General, said: “The combination of the war in Ukraine and COVID-19 lockdowns in China have pushed up energy costs, intensified supply chain disruptions, and fed inflation.” 

“The operating environment is challenging for all businesses, including air cargo. But with China easing lockdown restrictions, there is cause for some optimism and the supply/demand imbalance is keeping yields high,” Walsh added.  

IATA also highlighted the decline of “new export orders” (which the association describes as a leading indicator of cargo demand and world trade) in all markets except the US.  

Regional performance data 

According to IATA, Asia-Pacific airlines saw air cargo volumes decrease by 15.8% in April 2022 compared to the same month in 2021. This was the weakest performance of all regions and significantly slower than the previous month.  

European carriers saw a 14.4% decrease in cargo volumes in April 2022 compared to the same month in 2021, while Middle Eastern carriers experienced a 11.9% year-on-year decrease in cargo volumes in April. African airlines saw cargo volumes decrease by 6.3% in April 2022 compared to April 2021, the association added.  

North American carriers reported a 6.6% decrease in cargo volumes in April 2021 compared to April 2021 but noted that routes such as Europe-North America remained strong, posting an increase of 5.2% compared to April 2021. 

Latin American carriers reported an increase of 40.9% in cargo volumes in April 2022 compared to the 2021 period. This was the strongest performance of all regions. IATA attributed the result to the increasing optimism of airlines in the region, which have introduced new services, enhanced capacity, as well as investments into additional aircraft for air cargo. 

Source: Aerotime Hub

A Brief Guide To Your Rights As A Passenger On A Canceled Flight

Laws in every country provide passengers with broad rights in case of airline cancelations, including compensation and refunds.

Nobody likes hearing the dreaded message that their flight has been canceled. However, it’s not all bad news (depending on where you live), with airlines required to offer compensation and new flights. Here’s a guide to your rights as a passenger if your flight is canceled.

All about timing

For the sake of this article, we will focus on flight cancelation rights offered by the European Union (which the UK currently follows as well) and the US. The United States does not legally require airlines to provide any compensation for a delayed or canceled service except for a refund.

However, airlines have historically offered basics such as a new flight, food vouchers, and a hotel for overnight delays. The only situation where travelers in the US can claim benefits is if they are ‘bumped’ or unable to fly due to an oversold flight.

When it comes to the EU and UK, benefits are a lot more generous depending on your route and the airline’s notification of cancelation. These rights are codified in the EU Directive 261/2004 (EU261), which means airlines must provide these in case of any cancelations. Here’s a detailed look.

The conditions

Before calculating your dues from the airline, here are the important conditions to fulfill to be eligible. EU261 includes:

  • ALL flights departing from an EU airport;
  • Any flights arriving at an EU airport that are operated by EU airlines only.

If your flight meets these conditions, it’s time to check when you were notified of the cancelation. Here’s what matters:

  • 14 days or more: no compensation (only refund or rebooking)
  • 7 to 14 days: Compensation granted if the airline cannot offer an alternate flight that leaves two hours before the original flight and lands less than four hours later.
  • Under 7 days: Compensation granted if the airline cannot offer a new route that leaves less than an hour before the original flight and lands less than two hours later.

If you’ve ticked off both these conditions, here’s a look at the compensation you’ll receive for your axed flight.

How far are you going?

Airlines owe you two things if your flight is canceled less than 14 days from departure and no acceptable rerouting is available: the first is monetary compensation, and the second is a duty of care. Here’s the breakdown of how much to expect in cash:

  • Flights under 1,500 kilometers: €250
  • Over 1,501 kilometers (within the EU) and between 1,501 and 3,500 kilometers (outside the EU): €400
  • Over 3,500 kilometers (outside the EU): €600

Given the price you paid and plans affected, these figures might seem generous or lacking. However, a €200 compensation for a cheap EU flight is a good deal. However, the more significant benefit of longer delays might be the duty of care EU261 requires airlines to provide.

Duty of care means airlines have to:

  • Provide vouchers for meals with the value depending on the length of delays
  • Hotel rooms for overnight connections
  • Reimbursement for communication-related expenses such as a SIM card or phone calls.

Notably, in cases where “extraordinary events” (such as unseen weather or strikes) occur, airlines do not need to provide monetary compensation but must still offer a duty of care.

Source: Simple Flying

How Tanzania plans to raise receipts from travel sector

Dar es Salaam. The government yesterday unveiled strategies to boost tourism recovery as the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism asked Parliament to endorse Sh624.1 billion for its budget for the next financial year.

The tourism sector underwent a series of highs and lows with effect from March 2020 when Covid-19 pandemic hit the world with full force and is now enduring the consequences of a third wave that was triggered by the Omicron variant.

Tabling the budget for her docket in Parliament, Tourism minister Pindi Chana said the strategies aimed at bolstering the sector include shaping domestic tourism, diversifying tourism products, boosting competitiveness and intensifying marketing.

The list of strategies also includes improvement of tourism infrastructure, launching of white rhino tourism in Burigi, Chato and Mikumi National Parks, as well as preparation of a strategy meant for spurring conferences and events tourism. Other strategies include preparation of the sixth Swahili International Tourism Expo and coordination of the fam trip that would bring on board tourism agencies, journalists, celebrities, tourism goodwill ambassadors and tourism investors.

Dr Chana said the government would give the much-needed boost to domestic tourism with a view to moulding the sector and up its contribution to the economy.

Official data has it that the tourism sector was currently accounting for 25 percent of the country’s foreign earnings and creating 1.6 million direct and indirect jobs per annum.

Ambassador Chana said already the approach of giving support to domestic tourism proved itself to be effective and on that the figures could speak for themselves. With campaigns promoting domestic tourism, the country registered 788,933 domestic tourists in 2021, up from 562,549 registered in the preceding year, official data shows.

“The increase was attributable to various efforts including marketing of rhino tourism,” said Dr Chana.

On another hand, she said that her ministry would continue to embrace the Royal Tour that was launched in April in the US with a view to marketing the country’s tourist attractions and attracting more tourists.

To cope with the expected increase in foreign visitors in the country, the minister expressed the government’s commitment to coming up with new strategic tourism products like beach tourism, conferences and events hosting, cruise tourism and recreational and cultural tourism.

In a fresh bid to diversify the country’s sources of tourists and take up the number of visitors, The Citizen understands that the Tanzania Tourist Board (TTB) is already conducting research to identify new products that would be attractive to both domestic and foreign tourists.

President Samia Suluhu Hassan is on record as saying 1.4 million tourists visited the East African nation in 2021 amid the Covid-19 pandemic that hugely affected the tourism industry.

To prop up this vital sector of the economy and make the country’s dream of hitting 5 million tourists by 2025 become a reality, the government has increased the sector’s budget by 9.2 percent in the 2022/23 financial year compared to the current financial year.

The government plans to spend Sh624.1 billion during the next financial year, up from the current financial year’s Sh571.6 billion.

Of the amount, some Sh180.4 billion is meant for development projects, with the rest going to recurrent expenditures.

The projects the government plans to implement in the next financial year include Resilient Natural Resources Management for Tourism and Growth, Public Finance Management and Reform, Support to Combat Poaching and Illegal Wildlife Trade in Tanzania.

Others are Private Plantation and Value Chain in Tanzania and Capacity Building in Forestry and Beekeeping, Support to Beekeeping Value Chain Programme, as well as the meetings, incentives, conventions and exhibitions (Mice) Tourism Development Project.

The Parliamentary Committee on Land, Natural Resources and Tourism was of the view that the government should invest massively in diversifying the country’s tourism products.

“Like we do on animal tourism, we need to intensify our campaign in identifying and marketing other tourist attractions,” said the committee’s vice chairman Shaban Shekilindi. For this to be realised, the committee suggested for the government to see the need of not only disbursing all money meant for development projects, but also on time.

“It is through broadening tourism products that the government’s plan to hit 5 million tourists by 2025 will come true,” Mr Shekilindi stressed. “And it is through the same path that earnings from the sector will jump from $2.6 billion in 2020 to $6 billion in 2025.”

Again, the committee was of the view that the government should expedite the review of outdated policies and laws that were acting as hindrances to the growth of the tourism sector.

He said policies that needed to be reviewed include Tanzania National Tourism Policy of 1999, Tanzania National Forest Policy of 1998 and National Beekeeping Policy of 1998.

Source: The Citizen

IATA Criticizes EU Airline Emissions Credit Scheme Expansion

The EU and IATA both want to reduce emissions so why can’t they work together on one global solution, rather than chasing their own agendas?

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) went into a tailspin after the European Parliament voted on June 8 to expand its European Union Emissions Trading System (ETS) rules.

ETS aviation is part of the European Union’s (EU) ‘Fit for 55 in 2030’ package, the EU’s plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels, in line with the European Climate Law. The European Commission had previously proposed applying the ETS to intra-EU flights and CORSIA (Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation) to international flights departing from and arriving in the EU. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has adopted CORSIA as the worldwide market-based means to limit aviation’s CO2 emissions.

The European Parliament has now adopted the proposal that the ETS should apply to all flights departing from an airport located in the European Economic Zone. This zone includes the 27 member states of the EU, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. The parliament voted 479 in favor, 130 against with 32 abstentions. It also wants the current free allocations to the aviation sector to be phased out by 2025 and that 75% of the revenues generated from auctioning allowances for aviation be used to support innovation and new technologies.

IATA represents around 290 airlines and says this unilateral decision by the European Parliament (EP) will weaken and potentially dismantle the existing CORSIA agreement. The EP push is incompatible with CORSIA and could result in EU operators being double charged for their emissions. IATA Director General Willie Walsh said the decision would endanger international cooperation to tackle aviation’s climate change impacts. He called on the European Council to seek a multilateral solution at this year’s ICAO Assembly.

In 2012 a previous attempt to impose the ETS extra-territorially failed. Walsh said the impact of any regional initiative by the EU will be quickly neutralized if it derails decarbonization efforts in faster-growing markets outside of Europe.

Can ICAO keep CORSIA intact globally?

Both the European ETS and CORSIA allow airlines to buy credits to offset their emissions. The status quo was that the ETS applied to flights within the EU zone and CORSIA was a separate international agreement. The Aerospace and Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD) also called on the EP to reject the proposed change, saying it could derail discussions in ICAO on adopting a global Long Term Aspirational Goal for civil aviation and the future of CORSIA. The aviation industry is keen for ICAO to adopt the net-zero by 2050 target and the ASD says the unilateral stance of the EU will likely result in the inability of ICAO to adopt such an important target.

CORSIA is not without its critics, who believe the scheme is ineffective in tackling climate change impacts from aviation. Aviation needs to work together to develop effective industry-wide and global solutions, and the September ICAO Assembly is the chance to do that. But will they?

Source: Simple Flying